Evidence Intelligence for Complex Litigation
Complex Evidence.
Structured Intelligence.
Every important finding remains traceable to its original source.
ATHENA transforms contracts, emails, invoices, financial records, witness statements and digital case material into structured forensic evidence systems that legal professionals can navigate, verify and use with confidence.
Book a Confidential Consultation \u2192The Problem
Complex cases rarely fail because evidence does not exist.
They fail because the evidence is fragmented, difficult to navigate and easy to overlook. Large disputes and investigations frequently involve thousands of files, years of correspondence, changing contract versions, inconsistent calculations, duplicate and missing records, competing witness accounts, unclear financial flows and material scattered across different systems — with important facts hidden inside ordinary correspondence.
Before ATHENA
- Scattered folders
- Unconnected emails
- Inconsistent filenames
- Separate spreadsheets
- Unclear chronology
- Unverified calculations
- Hidden contradictions
- Unanswered questions
- Months of manual review
After ATHENA
- Controlled evidence register
- Complete chronology
- Source-linked findings
- Financial reconciliation
- Contradiction matrix
- Witness correlation
- Evidence mapping
- Missing-evidence analysis
- Structured investigation roadmap
ATHENA changes the usability of the evidence without changing the evidence itself.
What We Do
Forensic evidence organisation for complex matters
ATHENA reports facts, patterns, inconsistencies and unanswered questions. Legal conclusions remain with the appropriate lawyer, investigator, prosecutor or court.
Evidence Organisation
Creation of a controlled register covering the available case material.
Source Register
Structured documentation of original filenames, dates, authors, categories and references.
Chronology Reconstruction
A source-supported timeline of relevant events, communications, transactions and decisions.
Financial Reconciliation
Comparison of invoices, payments, contractual rates, transactions and calculated differences.
Contract Analysis
Structured comparison of contract versions, amendments, obligations and relevant commercial terms.
Contradiction Analysis
Identification of material inconsistencies between statements, records, calculations and timelines.
Evidence Matrix
Connection of each material finding to supporting and conflicting evidence.
Witness Correlation
Comparison of witness statements with documents, correspondence and financial records.
Relationship Mapping
Visualisation of links between individuals, companies, contracts, payments, communications and events.
Missing Evidence Assessment
Identification of unanswered questions, missing records and evidence requiring further investigation.
Investigation Roadmap
A structured list of recommended questions and potential investigative steps for qualified professionals.
Litigation Support
Ongoing organisation and updating of the evidence system as the matter develops.
Methodology
The ATHENA Forensic Intelligence Methodology
A documented, repeatable and quality-controlled professional process. Every case is different — report structure is adapted to the evidence and agreed scope. Select a stage to see what it involves.
- Identify the case purpose
- Define the period under review
- Identify relevant parties
- Establish the evidence categories
- Define the expected outputs
- Agree confidentiality and access conditions
- Collect available source material
- Preserve original filenames
- Record folders and data sources
- Document file types
- Identify duplicates and unreadable files
- Create an initial evidence inventory
- Assign evidence IDs
- Categorise documents
- Identify dates, authors and recipients
- Link related records
- Separate primary evidence from derived analysis
- Arrange material events by date
- Connect events to source documents
- Identify conflicting dates
- Identify gaps in the timeline
- Distinguish established facts from allegations
- Compare expected and actual amounts
- Trace invoices and payments
- Identify recurring discrepancies
- Map financial relationships
- Document calculation methodology
- Compare statements with records
- Compare contracts with operational behaviour
- Compare financial records with communications
- Identify supported and unsupported assertions
- Record unresolved inconsistencies
- Connect each finding to its sources
- Identify supporting and conflicting evidence
- Classify certainty
- Identify missing documentation
- Formulate precise questions requiring further investigation
- Executive summary
- Methodology
- Source register
- Chronology
- Financial reconciliation
- Evidence matrix
- Contradiction register
- Witness matrix
- Relationship map
- Unanswered questions
- Appendices and source references
Interactive Sample Case
Explore an ATHENA case system
Experience how fragmented evidence can be converted into a structured, traceable and professionally documented case system.
Summary of fictional findings
- — Recurring invoice discrepancies across multiple billing periods Supported fact
- — Inconsistent explanations for pricing changes Contradiction
- — Differences between contractual rates and operational calculations Supported fact
- — Missing approval records for a 2022 pricing change Unanswered question
- — Conflicting dates across correspondence and system records Requires verification
- — Questions concerning system access and authorisation Unanswered question
The available fictional material identifies matters requiring further legal, technical and financial assessment. ATHENA does not determine liability or intent.
| Evidence ID | Document Title | Type | Date | Author / Source | Category | Status | Cross-refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATH-E-0001 | Master Services Agreement | Contract | 14 Jan 2021 | Both parties | Contractual | Verified | E-0002, E-0003 |
| ATH-E-0002 | Pricing Schedule | Contract Annex | 02 Mar 2021 | Both parties | Contractual | Verified | E-0001 |
| ATH-E-0003 | Internal Pricing Email | 18 Sep 2021 | Finance Dept. | Correspondence | Verified | E-0002, E-0007 | |
| ATH-E-0004 | Invoice Batch — March 2022 | Invoice Set | 31 Mar 2022 | Finance Dept. | Financial | Verified | E-0005 |
| ATH-E-0005 | Payment Reconciliation | Spreadsheet | 05 Apr 2022 | External accountant | Financial | Verified | E-0004 |
| ATH-E-0006 | Witness Statement A | Statement | 12 Apr 2023 | Witness A | Testimonial | Pending review | E-0007 |
| ATH-E-0007 | System Change Log | System Record | 02 Feb 2023 | IT Systems | Digital | Verified | E-0003, E-0006 |
| ATH-E-0008 | Board Meeting Note | Internal Record | 18 Nov 2022 | Management | Corporate | Verified | E-0004 |
A full ATHENA evidence register spans every item collected for the matter, filterable by date range, document type, party, category and verification status.
Select an event to see its fictional detail. A full ATHENA chronology links every entry to supporting evidence.
All figures below are fictional and shown only to demonstrate the presentation format.
Expected vs. recorded value — monthly (fictional)
Every financial figure in an actual ATHENA report is presented with a visible source-reference icon linking it back to the underlying invoice, payment record or ledger entry.
| Original Clause | Later Clause / Practice | Source | Effective Date | Identified Difference | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate calculated per unit shipped, fixed schedule (Annex A). | Rate calculated per weight band, variable schedule. | ATH-E-0002 | Jan 2022 | Calculation basis changed | Confirmed difference |
| Monthly invoicing cycle. | Invoices issued on irregular intervals from Q2 2022. | ATH-E-0004 | Apr 2022 | Cycle inconsistency | Interpretation required |
| Amendments require written approval from both parties. | No corresponding written amendment located for Jan 2022 change. | ATH-E-0007 | — | Missing amendment | Missing amendment |
| Dispute notice period of 30 days. | Supplier query raised outside the formal notice window. | ATH-E-0004 | Jun 2022 | Procedural timing | Requires legal assessment |
| Statement | Source | Date | Supporting Evidence | Conflicting Evidence | Materiality | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “Pricing calculations were never changed.” | Witness A, interview transcript | Apr 2023 | — | ATH-E-0007, ATH-E-0003 | High | Documented contradiction |
| “All amendments were approved in writing.” | Board meeting note | Nov 2022 | ATH-E-0001 | No corresponding amendment on file | High | Unresolved |
| “Invoicing followed the standard monthly cycle throughout.” | Internal pricing email | Sep 2021 | ATH-E-0004 (2021) | ATH-E-0004 (2022 batch) | Medium | Contextual |
| “System access was limited to finance staff.” | Internal pricing email | Mar 2022 | — | ATH-E-0007 (change log) | Medium | Not assessed |
Select a witness to see connected evidence.
Witness A
Witness B
Witness C
Witness D
Select a node to highlight its connected documents and events.
ATHENA separates what the evidence demonstrates from what remains alleged, uncertain or unresolved.
| ID | Finding | Supporting | Conflicting | Classification | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATH-F-01 | Pricing calculation method changed in Jan 2022 without a documented amendment. | ATH-E-0001, ATH-E-0007 | — | Supported fact | High |
| ATH-F-02 | Witness A's statement conflicts with the system change log regarding pricing consistency. | ATH-E-0007 | ATH-E-0006 | Contradiction | Medium |
| ATH-F-03 | Approval record for the Jan 2022 change could not be located. | — | — | Missing evidence | — |
| ATH-F-04 | Supplier raised concerns about invoice differences in Jun 2022. | ATH-E-0004 | — | Supported fact | High |
| ATH-F-05 | Financial benefit resulting from the calculation change is undetermined. | — | — | Requires expert verification | — |
Fictional Case Status Summary
The fictional review identified a controlled evidence base of 4,260 documents, one confirmed contract calculation change, one material contradiction between witness testimony and system records, and three unanswered questions requiring further legal, technical or financial assessment.
This is a demonstration status only. ATHENA does not determine liability, guilt or case outcome. Legal conclusions remain the responsibility of the instructing legal team.
Sample Report
Download the Sample ATHENA Report
A professionally formatted fictional sample showing the structure of an ATHENA forensic evidence report.
Sample ATHENA Forensic Report
An 8-page fictional excerpt covering the executive summary, evidence register, chronology, financial reconciliation and evidence matrix — formatted exactly as a real ATHENA deliverable would be.
This sample contains fictional information created solely to illustrate the ATHENA methodology and does not constitute legal advice.
Pricing
Clear pricing. No hidden fees.
ATHENA uses transparent fixed-fee estimates based primarily on the number and complexity of records, the number of parties, requested analytical modules and required delivery speed. Data size is collected for upload and infrastructure planning, but gigabytes alone do not determine the analytical workload. All prices exclude applicable VAT unless otherwise specified.
ATHENA Essential
- Evidence inventory & source register
- Document classification
- Core chronology
- Basic cross-referencing
- Key unanswered questions
- Executive summary & final PDF report
- One review meeting
- Secure digital delivery
15–20 business days · up to 10 GB included
ATHENA Professional
- Everything in Essential
- Detailed chronology
- Contract comparison
- Financial reconciliation
- Contradiction matrix
- Witness matrix & evidence matrix
- Relationship mapping
- Up to 6 report volumes · two review meetings
20–30 business days · up to 35 GB included
ATHENA Advanced
- Everything in Professional
- Advanced financial reconstruction
- Multi-contract comparison
- Expanded relationship mapping
- Complex transaction analysis
- Missing-evidence assessment
- Up to 12 report volumes · interactive dashboard
- Three review meetings
30–45 business days · up to 100 GB included
ATHENA Enterprise
- Complex multi-party structures
- Large financial datasets
- Multiple jurisdictions or languages
- Continuous evidence updates
- Dedicated project lead
- Custom report & dashboard architecture
- Scheduled legal-team briefings
Final fixed fee confirmed after scope review
What is included in the quoted price?
- Agreed evidence intake & classification
- Source referencing
- Analytical work included in the selected scope
- Report preparation & internal quality review
- Agreed review meetings
- Secure digital delivery & standard project communication
- Ordinary report corrections & final agreed output
- No platform subscription or hidden administrative fee
Not included unless separately selected
- Translation or certified translation
- Physical document scanning
- Travel, court attendance or testimony
- External expert opinions
- Third-party forensic laboratory work
- External data-recovery services
- Specialist legal advice
- Customs, government or court charges
These items are never added to a project without the client's prior written approval.
Instant Quote
Calculate your ATHENA project estimate
Answer a few questions and receive an immediate estimate. You can email the estimate to yourself at the end.
1. Case type
This helps us understand context. It does not automatically create a surcharge unless the matter clearly requires extra modules.
2. Approximate number of records
A record can be a document, email, invoice, spreadsheet, witness statement, transaction file or other separate evidentiary item.
3. Approximate data size
File size does not determine analytical complexity. Data volume is used primarily for secure intake, storage and processing planning.
4. Number of principal parties
Principal parties may include companies, directors, witnesses, counterparties or other actors requiring separate analysis.
5. Select required analytical modules
The base package always includes evidence inventory, source register, classification, basic chronology, key questions, executive summary and the final PDF report. Modules already included in your recommended package are marked automatically.
6. Languages
Machine-assisted working translation may support internal analysis. Certified or sworn translations are not included unless separately agreed.
7. Delivery speed
Delivery is not guaranteed until evidence quality and scope are reviewed.
8. Required output
Choose how you'd like the finished evidence system delivered.
Your ATHENA estimate
This is an automated estimate based on the information entered. It is not a binding engagement agreement. Before work begins, ATHENA will conduct a brief scope and evidence-format review, and no additional cost will be charged without your prior written approval.
See exactly how this price was calculated
Live Estimate
Your estimate will build here as you answer each step.
Engagement Terms
Engagement and payment terms
Projects below €5,000
- 100% upon engagement
Projects €5,000 – €15,000
- 60% upon engagement
- 40% before final delivery
Projects above €15,000
- 40% upon engagement
- 30% at agreed project milestone
- 30% before final delivery
Ongoing monthly services are payable monthly in advance. No work begins before written engagement. The final scope and price are documented in writing. There are no hidden platform fees and no automatic renewal unless expressly agreed. External costs require written approval, and late delivery of material by the client may affect the project timetable.
Confidentiality
Confidential by design
Complex disputes frequently involve sensitive commercial and personal material. ATHENA follows a controlled intake and handling process.
NDA available before evidence transfer
Minimum necessary access
Controlled user permissions
Secure transfer arrangements
Source preservation
Structured evidence inventory
Version control
Client-approved retention period
Documented deletion process
No public use of client material
No client names used in marketing without written permission
Who ATHENA Serves
Built for legal and investigative professionals
Commercial Litigation Lawyers
White-Collar Criminal Lawyers
Corporate Legal Departments
Insolvency Practitioners
Forensic Accountants
Insurance Investigators
Compliance Teams
Shareholder Dispute Teams
Construction Dispute Specialists
Logistics & Transport Disputes
International Trade Disputes
Internal Corporate Investigations
Public-Sector Investigators
Companies Preparing Evidence for Legal Review
Why ATHENA
Evidence should be understandable, testable and traceable
Clearer case structure
Faster navigation
Reduced risk of overlooking relevant material
Auditable calculations
Consistent source references
Separation of fact, allegation and inference
Transparent identification of gaps
Better communication between lawyers, investigators and experts
Repeatable report methodology
Controlled updates as new evidence arrives
Predictable pricing
Quality & Human Review
Technology-assisted. Human-reviewed.
ATHENA uses advanced technology to support classification, comparison, search, reconciliation and cross-referencing. Technology does not make legal conclusions. Material findings are reviewed within the agreed methodology and connected to source records. The final responsibility for legal analysis and legal strategy remains with qualified professionals.
The technology accelerates the work. The methodology controls the work. The source evidence supports the work.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
What is an ATHENA report?
A structured forensic organisation of available case material containing source registers, chronologies, financial reconciliation, evidence matrices, contradictions and unanswered questions.
Does ATHENA prove guilt?
No. ATHENA does not determine guilt, liability or criminal intent.
Does ATHENA create evidence?
No. ATHENA works with existing material supplied or lawfully made available.
Is ATHENA a law firm?
No. ATHENA does not provide legal advice.
Does ATHENA replace a forensic expert?
No. Matters requiring specialised expert evidence may still require an appropriately appointed expert.
Can ATHENA work with my lawyer?
Yes. ATHENA is designed primarily to support lawyers, investigators and professional case teams.
Can private clients use ATHENA?
Yes, but engagement with legal counsel may be recommended depending on the matter.
How is pricing calculated?
Pricing reflects record volume, complexity, number of parties, analytical modules, languages and urgency.
Why is price not based only on gigabytes?
File size does not reliably represent workload. A small email archive may contain hundreds of thousands of records, while a large video or scanned archive may contain relatively few items.
Are prices fixed?
The online calculator provides an estimate. A final fixed fee is confirmed after a brief scope review.
Are there hidden charges?
No. The engagement agreement identifies included services and any approved external costs.
Can I upload my case immediately?
The public website accepts only non-confidential scope information. Secure evidence intake is arranged separately.
Can ATHENA handle multiple languages?
Yes, subject to scope. Certified legal translation is separate unless included in writing.
Can the report be updated?
Yes. Ongoing support and controlled report updates are available.
How long does a project take?
Depending on scope, approximately 15–45 business days under standard delivery.
Can ATHENA guarantee a legal outcome?
No.
Contact
Bring structure to your case material
Calculate an instant estimate, book a confidential consultation, request a formal proposal, or ask a methodology question.
Get Started
Your evidence may already contain the answers.
ATHENA helps legal and investigative teams find the structure, connections, contradictions and unanswered questions hidden inside complex case material.